Iowa · Speed to power

Announced is not energized. We know where the power is.

The headlines say Iowa has four times more committed data center capacity than power to serve it. The number is real, and most of that commitment is a press release. The projects that actually energize belong to the developers who already sat down with the utility, the county, and the landowner. Speed to power is a people business. We know the people.

1,246MW
Hyperscale capacity running in Iowa today

Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Apple campuses, all 100 MW or larger.

3,750MW
Announced, and not yet energized

Ten campuses in permitting or construction. A pipeline, not a fact on the ground.

200+
Data center projects cancelled in Q1 2026

Nationally, in one quarter. Announced capacity is a press release; permitting and a county vote decide what becomes a substation.

4-5YRS
Interconnection wait for a cold start

For a greenfield site at the back of the queue. Not the clock for an already energized position.

Iowa capacity figures: Clean Energy Districts of Iowa data center tracker, which lists every campus of 100 MW or larger by facility, utility, and county. Cancellation count: national, Q1 2026.

Headline vs. reality

The constraint is not power. It is knowing where the power is.

Every developer reads the same queue. What separates the projects that energize is who has already sat down with the utility, the county, and the landowner.

01

“There is no capacity left”

In aggregate, close to true. In detail, wrong. Capacity spoken for in one utility territory is often open in the next one over.

What we do about it

We know which meters still have room, because we asked the people who run them long before we needed the answer.

02

“Everything is already overcommitted”

Announced capacity is a press release. Iowa carries projects that will not clear permitting, a water study, or a county vote.

What we do about it

The projects that energize arrive with community consent already in hand. Ours do, because we live in these counties.

03

“It will take years to get online”

For a cold start, yes. That is a different clock from capacity already energized, already permitted, and sized for the load.

What we do about it

Containerized capacity on an existing interconnection energizes in months. With studies complete and agreements signed, MISO can approve a large load in as little as 120 days.

Few operators can tell you which of those three you are actually facing. That answer does not come out of a queue report. It comes from the people who have been in the room.

Track record

We asked the utility for five megawatts. We run a hundred and fifty.

The first goal Simple Mining set was five megawatts in five years. We operate thirty times that.

  1. 2021

    5MW

    The original goal

    The first ask we ever took to a utility.

  2. 2026

    150MW

    Operational today

    Thirty times that plan, across three Iowa data centers.

  3. 2031

    1GW

    Operational capacity

    Our ten-year goal. 500+ MW is already in development.

How we get there

We are not replacing the first business. We are building the next one on top of it.

Amazon built warehouses and compute for retail; that infrastructure became AWS. Our sites, substations, and crews already exist.

  1. Today

    Hosting and operations

    The business that built the company, still growing.

  2. Next

    AI colocation

    The same sites, power positions, and crews, taking on AI workloads. Anchor leases contracted before speculative.

  3. Future

    Onsite generation

    Behind-the-meter projects that put generation next to the load instead of queuing for someone else's.

Start here

Tell us the date. We will tell you where the power is.

Give us the megawatts, the rack density, and the month you need to be live. We will come back with the sites that can hold it and the interconnection status of each. Not a queue position. An answer.